User talk:Branddobbe

This user may have left Wikipedia. Branddobbe has not edited Wikipedia since August 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

My friends, can your hearts stand the shocking facts about grave robbers from outer space?

Please don't ask me to vote in a deletion debate unless it's about an article that I started or put a lot of work into.

Please don't invite me into a Wikiproject; I am not interested.

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

This is a page for you to talk to me. Please feel free to leave a comment if you have anything you would like to talk about.

Baseketball or BASEketball

Hey, I noticed that you recently reverted the capitalisation that was introduced into the Inland Empire (film) article. This article was brought to my attention in a discussion regarding capitalisation of the film Baseketball, here. The debate is basically over whether the film should be referred to as Baseketball or BASEketball. I have tried explaining that standard English should be used, but I have been ignored and my move reverted, despite the fact that the film doesn't even use the unusual capitalisation itself (just large vs small typeface). I was going to start a discussion on this at WP:MOSTM or maybe WP:NC, but just thought I'd get a second opinion from someone who seems to have a similar understanding of said policies and guidelines. Is there something I am missing? Could this actually be a special case? Or does WP:MOSTM apply here as elsewhere. Thanks for your time. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday Night Live: 1994-5 season question

Hi,

After poring through old additions to the "History of Saturday Night Live (1990-1995)" page, I believe I have it correctly figured out that you wrote the synopsis of the '94-5 season, in which this sentence was included:

However, the day that Garofalo arrived on the set, Adam Sandler started yelling at her because of remarks she had made against him in her standup routine. Fellow female cast members (Ellen Cleghorne and Laura Kightlinger) banded against her immediately.

There isn't a footnote or reference to how you obtained this information, and, as someone who has read countless stories about Garofalo's situation at SNL (told by both her and others) I have never heard any of that info about Cleghorne and Kightlinger and am very curious where you got it from. I am not in any way stating that you are wrong. It's just that I read all her excerpts in "Live from New York: An Oral History of SNL" as well as Fred Wolf and Jim Downey's rants against her; I read the 1995 behind the scenes New York Magazine article which had many sections about her, some of which are cited in your synopsis. But I have never read anything about Cleghorne or Kightlinger's take on her; nor have I read that Sandler yelled at her, only that he avoided her out of spite. Would you mind telling me how you got that info as I'm very interested? Thanks, Sam —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samweisberg (talk • contribs) 20:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, that wasn't me -Branddobbe (talk) 22:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Euro nitpicking

I wrote that sentence, but only because somebody else was complaining. -- Evertype·✆ 18:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CA County Routes

I still can't get over how the sort keys said State Route whatever for three months. --Rschen7754 (T C) 05:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright on Johnny Eck article

If you would like to be useful, try to be helpful with what needs to be altered rather than calling 'copyright infringement!' on a work-in-progress that is slowly morphing into an original document (compare what I've done to the copyrighted text--it is very quickly becoming totally different while recognizing where the facts originated). Hopefully, with help rather than useless deletions of very basic information, it can become acceptable to you. Please check the sources again (I'm not just reverting to copied text--there have been significant changes--even with added facts not in those sources) and compare the writing. If you think you could rewrite it while keeping the basic facts, but making it entirely different, do so. That was what I was doing until you killed the article.NileQT87 (talk) 18:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)NileQT87[reply]

Deletion of content

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Dollar coin (United States). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heaven's Gate animal rights controversy

Hi Eric,

I have edited the Heaven's Gate article so that it less redundant about the animal rights controversy. I also changed the wording of a sentence which you questioned "proven by whom?". I changed references of "proof" to "accusations", "assertions", "claims", etc. I agree with you that it is difficult to say something was "proven", and it is better to use an alternative word to maintain a neutral point of view.

Please read the current revision and let me know if it all right to delete your note "by whom?"

Thank you very much!!! LA Movie Buff (talk) 20:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of RinkWorks

I have nominated RinkWorks, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RinkWorks. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 00:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tag-deletion

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at European microstates, you will be blocked from editing. If you have a source supporting the claim you're welcome to add it and if you want to dispute the validity of the tag you can do so on the talk page, but simply removing the tag without providing any source is vandalism. JdeJ (talk) 15:28, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:West-Friesland.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:West-Friesland.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 05:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC) --▫ JohnnyMrNinja 05:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Brithday!

Was looking to see who had the same birthday as me. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 06:45, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cookie salad

Is also popular, but not as well known as snickers salad. And then there is pistachio salad, seven-layer salad and glorified rice. Enjoy. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Euclid

I have answered yo request. --Ysangkok (talk) 19:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Branddobbe! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

William Sleator - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route SIE

Template:California County Route SIE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 00:43, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route PLU

Template:California County Route PLU has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 00:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route SHA

Template:California County Route SHA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 00:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route LAS

Template:California County Route LAS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 00:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route TEH

Template:California County Route TEH has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 00:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route SIS

Template:California County Route SIS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 00:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route SCR

Template:California County Route SCR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 21:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route SOL

Template:California County Route SOL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 21:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route YOL

Template:California County Route YOL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 21:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route SCC

Template:California County Route SCC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 21:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route ED

Template:California County Route ED has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 21:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route AMA

Template:California County Route AMA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 21:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route BUT

Template:California County Route BUT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 21:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route ALA

Template:California County Route ALA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route CAL

Template:California County Route CAL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route CC

Template:California County Route CC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route DN

Template:California County Route DN has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route FRE

Template:California County Route FRE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route INY

Template:California County Route INY has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route LA

Template:California County Route LA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route MER

Template:California County Route MER has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route MON

Template:California County Route MON has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route MPA

Template:California County Route MPA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route SAC

Template:California County Route SAC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route SBT

Template:California County Route SBT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route SJ

Template:California County Route SJ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route STA

Template:California County Route STA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route TUL

Template:California County Route TUL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route TUO

Template:California County Route TUO has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 22:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route IMP

Template:California County Route IMP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 07:51, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route RIV

Template:California County Route RIV has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 07:51, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route ORA

Template:California County Route ORA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 07:52, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:California County Route SD

Template:California County Route SD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rs chen 7754 07:52, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010 USRD newsletter


Volume 3, Issue 1 • April 2010 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup This month in USRD history	Features US Roads Portal celebrates April Fool's Day Portal selected article and photo	State and national updates Project reports
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

— JCbot (talk) 19:08, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Tiptoety ^talk 05:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Romulan starship

I have nominated Romulan starship, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romulan starship. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Branddobbe/Personal/Cities and non-free files

Please stop placing non-free files onto User:Branddobbe/Personal/Cities. Per WP:NFCC #9, the use of such files is strictly limited to the article namespace. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 21:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images of official governmental flags aren't copyrighted; these files aren't "non-free". -Branddobbe (talk) 01:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- (let's keep discussion here) National flags, that's true. Local flags, that's not true. Local flags can and frequently are protected by copyright. File:Flag of Phoenix, Arizona-en.svg for example is copyrighted. If you believe otherwise, please obtain such release from the City of Phoenix. Contact information is available on their web site. In the meantime, do not place images marked as non-free onto userspace pages, as this is a direct violation of WP:NFCC #9. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Summer 2010 USRD newsletter


Volume 3, Issue 2 • Summer 2010 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup News in brief	Features Infobox road upgrade Editing needed near bottom of leaderboard Junction list updates	State and national updates Project reports
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

— JCbot (talk) 02:07, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fall 2010 USRD newsletter


Volume 3, Issue 3 • Fall 2010 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup News in brief Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Bot automates graphics creation, saves work Featured Article, eh? Reviews needed at ACR	State and national updates Project reports for Delaware Maryland Michigan Minnesota
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

— JCbot (talk) 01:17, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to How Do You Know (film)

I noticed that about 2 weeks ago you made an edit, an invisible note, to the above page. I hate needing to put on my admin hat, but since you *had* the page open, it would have been just as easy for you to correct the issue instead of, well...snarking. Wikipedia's had an awkward/inaccurate line for several weeks as no one else had noticed that problem. It's thankless to edit that sort of thing, but I'd encourage you to correct things like that in the future. Thanks! --Thespian (talk) 19:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Winter 2010 USRD newsletter

Volume 4, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter

Departments

Features

State and national updates

Project reports for

CA
MI
MN
NE

NJ
UT
WA

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—

JCbot (talk) 01:01, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Street accordion player.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Street accordion player.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:36, 27 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Musamies (talk) 02:36, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter, Spring 2011

Volume 4, Issue 2 • Spring 2011 • About the Newsletter

Departments

Features

State and national updates

Project reports for

CA
DE

MD
MI

PA

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—Rschen7754bot (talk) 02:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 4, Issue 3 • Fall 2011 • About the Newsletter

Departments

Features

State and national updates

Project reports for

CA
MD

MI
PA

VA
TX

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—JCbot (talk) 01:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LA-area Meetup: Saturday, November 19

	National Archives Backstage Pass at the Reagan Library
	You are invited to the first-ever backstage pass tour and Wikipedia editathon hosted by the Reagan Presidential Library, in Simi Valley, on Saturday, November 19th! The Reagan Library, home to a real Air Force One and other treasures from American history, will take Wikipedians on a special tour of the grounds and archives, followed by an editathon; free catered lunch provided. Please sign up! Dominic·t 20:57, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
	If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite.

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012


Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter
This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed.
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features U.S. Roads consolidates M-6 article makes headlines Planning Department debuts Stub drive concludes early, successfully Editorial	State and national updates Project news Task force reports for MD, MI, PA, and VA
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—Imzadi 1979 → 21:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday (2012)

Wishing Branddobbe a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 14:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Spring 2012


Volume 5, Issue 2 • Spring 2012 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Paving a path forward with KML Down and dirty with KML SPSs in need of removal from articles Maple Syrup Report	State and national updates Project news Task force reports for CA, DE, and MI
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—Imzadi 1979 → 00:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Summer 2012 Newsletter


Volume 5, Issue 3 • Summer 2012 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features U.S. Roads Project Goes to Wikimania Driving to 4 Million Michigan Reaches Milestone Maple Syrup Report	State and national updates Project news Task force reports for AK, CA, DE, GA, GU, LA, MO, MT, ND, OK, and TX
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—Imzadi 1979 → 22:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! FemTech Edit-a-Thon at Claremont Graduate University

October 26 - FemTech Edit-a-Thon & Roundtable - You are invited!

Everyone is invited to the first FemTech Edit-a-Thon & Roundtable at Claremont Graduate University on October 26 from 3-6 pm. The event will open with a roundtable discussion about feminism and anti-racist technology projects, followed by an edit-a-thon focusing on feminists & women in science. Experienced Wikipedians will be on hand to support new editors. We hope you can join us!

Sign up here - see you there! 00:50, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Vista, CA logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Vista, CA logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2013


Volume 6, Issue 1 • Winter 2013 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Wikidata Q&A USRD Cup returns Project looks ahead to new year	State and national updates Project news Task force reports for CA, FL, and PA
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—EdwardsBot (talk) 19:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Spring 2013


Volume 6, Issue 2 • Spring 2013 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Project creates route list standard Driving down under Meta and Wikidata update ACR becoming active, changing USRD Cup wraps up	State and national updates Project news Task force reports for CA, GA, MI, OK and WA
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—EdwardsBot (talk) 22:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Summer 2013


Volume 6, Issue 3 • Summer 2013 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Rewriting Infobox road and incorporating Wikidata Driving around the Pearl of the Orient Fixing our shields licensing	State and national updates Project news in brief Task force reports for CA, GA, MI, MN and WI
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—EdwardsBot (talk) 22:17, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Fall 2013


Volume 6, Issue 4 • Fall 2013 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Final push for 2013 goals A New York state of merger Templates, Lua, and sister projects	State and national updates Project news in brief Task force reports for CA, IA, MD, MI, and PA
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—EdwardsBot (talk) 03:07, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Winter 2013


Volume 7, Issue 1 • Winter 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features 2013 in review The Moon is rising: our Lua progress so far Looking ahead to 2014 The Maple Syrup Report	State and national updates Project news in brief Task force reports for CA, GA, MI, OH, PA, UT, WA, and WV
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Spring 2014


Volume 7, Issue 2 • Spring 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Under a moonlit (and lightning-quick) sky: Lua, , and what's next The new and improved HWY Cup Making shields 101 The Maple Syrup Report	State and national updates Project news in brief Five years ago... A chat with our newest USRD members
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of Imzadi1979[reply]

The Center Line: Summer 2014


Volume 7, Issue 3 • Summer 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features The U.S. Roads Portal: A great gateway to the project HWY Cup a success in improving the articles of WikiProject Highways	State and national updates None submitted
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979, 21:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hi fellow Wikipedian ! I would like to alert you that I have replied to your very interesting comment on the Talk page of Category talk:Fictional timelines, and I would like to see a reactivation of said discussion.

Joe Gatt (talk) 23:56, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Fourth Quarter 2014


Volume 7, Issue 4 • Fourth Quarter 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Maple Syrup Report Portal selected articles and pictures	Features The U.S. Roads Project Is Turning 10! 2014: The Year in Review Setting the bar for 2015	State and national updates CA, DE, MD, MI, MS, MP, OR Project news
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 10:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Fourth Quarter 2014


Volume 7, Issue 4 • Fourth Quarter 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Maple Syrup Report Portal selected articles and pictures	Features The U.S. Roads Project Is Turning 10! 2014: The Year in Review Setting the bar for 2015	State and national updates CA, DE, MD, MI, MS, MP, OR Project news
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 10:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Winter 2015


Volume 8, Issue 1 • Winter 2015 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Be part of the turnaround... now become part of the solution Raising the speed limit on KML creation RCS coming for the Texas FM/RM routes The bar is set for 2015	State and national updates CA, DE, MI In other project news...
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 18:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zentrifugal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zentrifugal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:38, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Spring 2015


Volume 8, Issue 2 • Spring 2015 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Route description 101 The nitty gritty of in-depth research	State and national updates Editor updates In other project news...
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 12:09, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Summer 2015


Volume 8, Issue 3 • Summer 2015 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Road to the past: Some tips on researching history sections Getting to know the editors behind the lenses	State and national updates State updates In other project news...
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) delivered on behalf of Imzadi1979 05:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: September 2015

Volume 8, Issue S1 • September 2015 • About the Newsletter

Happy 10th Anniversary!

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk) on 23:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: November 2015

Volume 8, Issue 4 • November 2015 • About the Newsletter

Departments

Features

State and national updates

• State updates
• In other project news...

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk) on 22:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of typefaces

The article List of typefaces has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have just come to the conclusion that this article is a mistake. It's impossible to list all the typefaces on Earth - or even the important ones - there are thousands. This is better dealt with by the typeface article, individual articles and by categories.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blythwood (talk) 11:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Spring 2017

Volume 9, Issue 1 • Spring 2017 • About the Newsletter

Departments

• Assessment roundup
• Portal selected articles and pictures

Features

State and national updates

• State updates
• In other project news...

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 on 01:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of You Damn Kid!

The article You Damn Kid! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for notability since 2010. Only source is primary, coverage appears to be limited to user-generated forums, primary sources, and blogs. Not seeing a WP:GNG pass here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm _Bacon 06:07, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of fictional states of the United States for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional states of the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional states of the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional states of the United States has been nominated for merging

Category:Fictional states of the United States has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 11:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"NyQuil" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect NyQuil and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 1 § NyQuil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:56, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]